USB-C vs. Lightning

USB-C vs. Lightning

updated by Rachel Gold
June 13, 2022 at 5:24 p.m.

Apple’s iPhone uses a proprietary Lightning connector instead of the industry standard USB-C port. This article compares USB-C vs. Lightning.

June 13, 2022 Update

The EU recently released new guidance on its plan to “harmonize” ports across portable devices. As usual, most in the media failed to read the EU’s actual press release. Thus, reporting from CNN, Computerworld, and The New York Times is inherently flawed, as their journalists failed to read or comprehend the EU’s straightforward documentation. Instead, they injected their personal opinion and usage scenarios, which don’t fit most consumers’ experiences. Some journalists wrote these as opinion columns; however, Google and other news aggregators take these as reliable journalism, with the highest rankings possible.

Most publications claim that the EU is forcing Apple to add USB-C ports to the iPhone by either 2024 or 2026. Both of these dates are erroneous. The European Parliament briefing mentions that USB-C is incompatible with some devices. These include the iPhone, Magic Keyboard, Magic Trackpad, and many non-Apple devices. These gadgets won’t come under scrutiny until 2028, with a plan to standardize them going into effect by 2030. By this date, Apple will most likely have a fully wireless ecosystem. USB-C will probably be obsolete by 2030.

According to A common charger for electronic devices Revision of the Radio Equipment Directive:

Devices that cannot be charged by USB Type-C: by the end of 2028, the Commission would be required to come up with a harmonised technical solution for wired charging for devices that cannot be charged with the USB Type-C, with application starting in 2030. Should the Commission fail to do so, it would be required to justify the decision not to do so to the Parliament and Council.

It cannot be stated more clearly than that. It’s unclear where the other “journalists” obtain dates like 2024 or 2026. They cite the same EU report but clearly failed to read it.

Furthermore, established tech websites ratchet up the conflict and drama, enticing users to click on articles. “Oooh, the EU is forcing Apple to make fundamental changes to their products for the good of humanity”. That’s not what the report says. If anything, the report is sympathetic to Apple, noting that only 18% of EU consumers own smartphones with Lightning connectors (iPhone). The real culprit is the USB Micro-B standard, which is still in use despite its lack of sufficient power and data bandwidth. Thirty-eight percent of European smartphones have USB Micro-B ports. But since Apple doesn’t use this port, there’s no juice to squeeze out of the true boogeyman — USB Micro-B.

Anyone who reads the EU’s report will find that Apple isn’t the target. The EU will give Apple up until 2030 to change to USB-C, as the company has already identified that this will create more e-waste and harm customers. Apple sent a reply to the EU, which the governing agency incorporated into their document:

More than 1 billion Apple devices have shipped using a Lightning connector in addition to an entire ecosystem of accessory and device manufacturers who use Lightning to serve our collective customers. We want to ensure that any new legislation will not result in the shipment of any unnecessary cables or external adaptors with every device, or render obsolete the devices and accessories used by many millions of Europeans and hundreds of millions of Apple customers worldwide. This would result in an unprecedented volume of electronic waste and greatly inconvenience users. To be forced to disrupt this huge market of customers will have consequences far beyond the stated aims of the Commission.

It’s really quite simple. If the EU forces Apple to switch ports, many people will have to buy new chargers and cables. They will throw out their old ones. If the iPhone sticks with Lightning, fewer people are affected. At worst, some road warriors need to bring an extra cable. They’ll have to do this anyway unless they feel like waking up at 2 am to swap charging cables. The iPhone comes with a USB-C to Lightning cable. You can plug it into virtually any charger.

Reading articles penned by confused tech writers, it’s clear they cannot separate their fantasies and delusions from the requirements of consumers. Most corporate tech journalists travel worldwide for indoctrination at various corporate campuses and events. They’re upset because they need to carry around extra cables. According to Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols at Computerworld, the multitude of wires is a nightmare for the tech journalist:

And, I might add, it’s seriously annoying. When I travel, I must take a USB-C, mini-USB, micro-USB, USB-A, Lightning, and a Qi charging pad for all my gadgets. Inevitably, I waste time trying to fit the wrong cable into the wrong port — and that’s before I start dancing the ‘which-way-is-up USB-A fandango?”

With all of those cables Steve has to pack, he won’t be able to fit as much SWAG in the luggage. Without the SWAG, what’s the motivation to write corporate-friendly tech articles? Much of the SWAG needs to be charged too! Unfortunately, Steve was too busy fiddling with cables to read the EU’s report. Instead, he decided to do what the vast majority of tech journalists do — blog their idiotic opinions. Realistically, if you go to any hotel, they still have USB-A plugs in nightstands, lamps, and desks, yet Steve has no problem with this.

In my opinion, which most should not care about, life wouldn’t be easier or harder if Apple switched to USB-C or stuck with Lightning. This is because Apple’s power adapters switched to USB-C some time ago. The main concern with the EU’s legislation is that consumers must own many different power adapters. Apple solved this problem years ago. If you can’t pack an extra cable or adapter, that’s just pathetic. They even gave you USB-C to Lightning cables. I have at least three.

Furthermore, there seems to be some delusion that if everything runs on USB-C, one can make do with one cable and power adapter for all devices. How do you charge them all at the same time? Will you wake up at 2am to unplug your iPhone and plug in your notebook? This is absurd. Not one of these moronic tech “journalists” thought this through. You’ll still need multiple cables, and if you don’t invest in some large, multi-port charger, multiple chargers too.

Clearly, the tech journalist community, if you can call them that, neglected to think this through. They didn’t even bother to read the EU’s documentation. After all, they’re writing for morons who want to read something combative while they’re waiting for supper. In my experience, those upset about Lightning hate Apple and don’t own any of its products. Between the EU, moronic tech journalists, and fanboys, this issue is riddled with delusions of life with one cable and one power adapter, where you wake up at 2 am to switch your charging cables. Clothing is so complicated too. Wouldn’t it just be easier to wear a sheet? Maybe the EU can fix that too.

There’s an excellent solution for those who cannot pack two cables. The Maogoam USB C to iOS Adapter clips onto the end of a USB-C cable. Simply snap on the Lightning adapter when you wake up at 2 am to unplug your notebook and plug in your iPad. Remember, when you start falling asleep at your important meeting (because you got up at 2 am and 4 am to swap your single charging cable), you only needed to bring one cable and one charger on this business trip! You are the road warrior!

September 23, 2021 Update

The European Union drafted new rules requiring USB-C ports on all relevant devices, such as smartphones, tablets, cameras, and notebook computers. The upcoming legislation, still years away from going into effect, aims to curb e-waste and consumer frustration. Research conducted by the EU found different charging ports on devices flustered consumers. Furthermore, the average EU resident owns three chargers.

The move is part of an overall program that has brought the number of charging ports down from thirty to three in the past decade. Apple’s Lightning port continues to impede EU consumer protection and environmental goals.

A gradual transition is necessary because many Apple devices have Lightning ports, including the Magic Keyboard, Magic Mouse, Apple TV Siri Remote, AirPods, and Beats headphones. It’s unclear if the new rules apply to keyboards, mice, and other accessories. According to the EU’s press release, these devices aren’t subject to upcoming regulations. 

Most modern Apple chargers use USB-C. USB-C to Lightning cables accompany many new Apple devices. Thus, backward compatibility isn’t an issue in this respect. However, one cannot plug their Lightning headphones into a future USB-C ported iPhone without an adapter. Other accessories, such as external microphones, cameras, speakers, or music equipment, will also need adapters. With Apple Music going high-fidelity, a slew of new external digital-to-analog converters are just hitting the market, many with Lightning plugs.

The EU rules make it clear that applicable devices must have USB-C ports, not just chargers. This means that the iPhone and other devices will either need to go wireless or adopt USB-C. The iPhone will likely go wireless before the EU rules go into effect, with accessories like AirPods cases, Beats headphones, and others adopting wireless charging or USB-C.

The new EU rules also require unbundling chargers and devices, a move first made by Apple. Samsung and other companies have followed suit, no longer supplying chargers with select devices. This limits e-waste and also conserves packaging and shipping weight for devices.

The new rules will likely pass the legislative process. Manufacturers have 24 months to comply after the regulations are finalized.

The ruling works in Apple’s favor. If the company switched to USB-C, they’d likely suffer the same media wrath that accompanied the last dock connector’s fate. The switch upsets some consumers who have invested in Lightning-based accessories. Also, accessory makers now have to re-design products to work with USB-C ports or wirelessly. Apple is off the hook. They must comply with the EU, and these changes will affect Apple devices worldwide. Unlike the last switch, no one can blame this on Apple.

UPDATE: March 3, 2021 — According to MacRumors, reliable Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo doesn’t expect the iPhone to use USB-C. Apple’s iconic smartphone will stick with a Lightning port until it goes wireless:

“If the iPhone abandons Lightning in the future, it may directly adopt the portless design with MagSafe support instead of using a USB-C port… At present, the MagSafe ecosystem is not mature enough, so the iPhone will continue to use the Lightning port in the foreseeable future.”

Being innovative isn’t easy. To innovate, one must often go against norms and standards. For over a decade, Apple used its proprietary 30-pin dock connector. This connector worked well for Apple products, as it provided room to grow. As Apple devices started adding support for video and other features, the data could be transmitted in parallel through the connector. The problem was that the connector was rather large. For a company that prides itself in making slim devices, it was time for a change.

A Brief History of the Lightning Connector

The Lightning connector was introduced in 2012, much to the dismay of vocal critics. Any change that Apple makes is destined to be criticized. The removal of the iPhone’s 3.5mm headphone jack also created a furor. The common complaint was that people would need to buy new accessories, or at least an adapter. The truth is that the 30-pin connector actually had a very long lifespan. A decade is an eternity in the world of technology. Apple’s 30-pin Dock connector impeded innovation.

The reality is that Apple once again had to go proprietary in order to innovate. Lightning was released two years prior to USB-C. Contemporary technologies, such as micro-USB simply weren’t good enough. Indeed, Apple’s Lightning connector influenced the design of USB-C. Apple actually contributed to the design of USB-C.

The similarities between Lightning and USB-C are obvious, but they’re not the same thing. Lightning ports are slimmer and more suitable for mobile devices. Despite what the rumors suggest, Apple is not going to replace Lightning ports with USB-C on the iPhone and iPad.

UPDATE: 2019 iPad Pro models feature a USB-C port. The iPhone and other iPad models still use the Lightning connector.

A Brief History of USB-C

Debuting in 2014, the USB-C standard evolved from a group of contributors, including 18 Apple employees. There’s a perception that Apple doesn’t play well with others, which is undeserved. The original iMac was actually the first computer that offered USB ports, back when PCs still had parallel and serial interfaces.

USB-C is an evolution of previous USB standards, and an attempt to be future proof (yeah, right). It’s possible to connect an older device to a new computer using a USB-A/B to USB-C cable. There are numerous USB hubs and docking stations that can multiply ports and provide connectivity for older USB devices. That said, the future of device connectivity is wireless, which is why some newer Apple notebooks only have one USB port.

It’s important to note that USB-C and the USB 3.1 standard are not the same thing. It’s possible for a USB-C port to not support USB 3.1. This exactly the sort of confusion that Apple tries to avoid.

USB-C vs. Lightning

Although Apple contributed to the development of USB-C, it’s not the same thing as Lightning. The most obvious difference is that Lightning ports are smaller. This gives Apple an advantage. They can make slimmer devices.

Lightning may also be more durable than USB-C. With Lightning, the connecting tabs are on the cable itself. USB-C has connecting tabs on the port. Since these tabs are possible points of failure, Lightning ports are more durable. If you happen to break the tabs on a Lightning cable, it’s easily remedied by replacing the cable. If they break on a USB-C port, the port on the device must be replaced. This is a huge difference in durability.

Both Lightning and USB-C are capable of conducting power at varying wattages. Apple doesn’t publicly disclose these specifications, however, they are available to third-party manufacturers. It seems that the power limits of USB were one of the reasons why Apple developed Lightning in the first place.

It’s safe to assume that Lightning can handle up to 12W of power, as provided by the iPad charger. Lightning can probably handle much more wattage, however, since it is designed for mobile devices, it’s simply not necessary. USB-C on the other hand, is known to handle up to 100 watts. This makes sense for desktop computers that are plugged in to a power source. USB-C could power a fairly loud amplifier or even a screen. This doesn’t mean that Lightning can’t do this, but your iPhone isn’t going to power a 100 watt amplifier. Since Lightning is not available on desktop computers, transmission of high wattage power isn’t necessary, although may be theoretically possible.

Data transmission speeds depend more on USB standards for both Lightning and USB-C. Lightning devices usually connect to a computer for data transfer. This is facilitated by a Lightning to USB cable. The data throughput actually depends on the ports on the source and target device. The first Lightning devices transferred data at USB 2.0 speeds. Newer devices have embraced newer USB standards. Apple hasn’t divulged the maximum theoretical data throughput for Lightning. In the real world, it is fast enough to take advantage of the newest standards.

Lightning connectors use far fewer pins than USB-C, but the latter doesn’t use all of its pins. Although USB-C uses 18 pins, only 9 are used at the same time. This allows the connector to be reversible. Lightning only uses 8 pins, however, the plug fits into the receptacle in a way which allows it to be reversible. Furthermore, electronics inside Apple devices determine the orientation of the plug and adjust accordingly. It sounds like a lot of effort, but it makes for a slimmer receptacle. This enables Apples to make such slim iPhones and iPads.

Lightning Is the Right Tool for the Job

Apple developed Lightning at a time when chunky USB ports were the only standard option. In order to make slimmer iPhones, it was necessary to develop their own proprietary connector. USB-C was two years away, and it still ended up having a larger footprint than Lightning.

Lightning is simply the right tool for the job. It’s intended for mobile devices. Not only is the connector smaller, but it is more robust. If you think about the abuse a mobile device takes, the latter aspect is appealing. Apple customers pay a premium price for iPhones and iPads and expect them to last. If Apple went with USB-C, their devices would be larger and more fragile.

Apple haters recoil at the very notion of Lightning. Once again, they claim Apple is creating something proprietary. “They don’t play well with others”. This simply isn’t true. Apple was a significant contributor to the USB-C standard. They quickly adopted this standard and added it to their MacBook lineup. The slimmer design of USB-C allowed them to create the thinnest MacBooks ever, while still retaining compatibility with standard peripherals.

The fact that MacBooks use USB-C and not Lightning demonstrates that Apple conforms to standards. But they also use the right tool for the job. For iPhones and iPads, the slimmer and more durable Lightning port was a great fit.

A lot of these decisions and outcomes are based on history. Lightning debuted two years prior to USB-C. Apple needed to make slimmer iPhones right away, and existing USB technology just didn’t provide the right solution. Now that Lightning is ingrained, Apple can’t just replace it with USB-C. This would be a slap in the face to customers and accessory makers. Also, USB-C is larger and less robust than Lightning. It’s simply more appropriate for mobile devices.

Wireless is the Future

Clickbait bloggers raised the possibility that Apple is replacing Lightning with USB-C. As we’ve covered, Lightning is still much more appropriate for mobile devices. Why would Apple replace Lightning with something that’s bigger and more fragile? They would also anger customers and accessory makers with such a move. It just doesn’t make sense.

Wireless is the future of device connectivity. This is exactly why Apple removed the 3.5mm headphone jack from the iPhone 7. It’s why the MacBook only has one USB-C port. People are simply not plugging devices into their computers, tablets and smartphones. Wireless headphones have replaced their wired ancestors. Printers, scanners and external drives are all wireless these days. You can even wirelessly connect to some displays. As wireless technology improves, the need for cables and ports will gradually be eliminated. Apple will replace Lightning with nothing. Your future iPhone won’t have any ports, making it much more durable and waterproof. When this day comes, critics will cry foul, but the vast majority of consumers will be better off. The days of dongles, adapters and messy cables are almost over. Good riddance!

2nd Gen AirPods at Amazon for $119


  1. At the top of this page it was written:

    Some journalists wrote these as opinion columns; however, Google and other news aggregators take these as reliable journalism, with the highest rankings possible.

    And then barely a paragraph or 2 later it was written:

    By this date, Apple will most likely have a fully wireless ecosystem. USB-C will probably be obsolete by 2030.

    Isnt that, like, an opinion?

    1. That’s a forecast — analysis over opinion. I have a career in tech, and I have every right to make an analytical forecast. You really think USB-C will be around in 2030, other than on old devices? I haven’t attached my iPhone or any phone to a computer with cables. Like most, I use wireless headphones. In the article, I also mention that Ming-Chi Kuo forecasts Apple switching to portless designs, not USB-C.

      Your little exercise completely misses the point. Every esteemed tech journalist pulled some date out of the air — 2024, 2026. The very crux of their articles is a fabricated guess, when all they had to do is read the European Parliament’s document. I actually found the document on a big, established tech site’s story (that’s what it is) which went on to say that USB-C would be required by 2024. I’m not surprised that every major tech publication got this wrong. They hire writers based on cronyism, not merit. All of the easy, high-paying jobs go to a certain type of person in this industry.

      Where does it mention 2024 or 2026 in the EU’s document? The regulatory document explicitly mentions that devices that cannot be charged by USB-C (Lightning) won’t even come under consideration until 2028, with policy going into effect by 2030.

      These are not journalists. These are lucky people who got hired through cronyism. They shouldn’t be writing about technology. They have no experience. They can’t even read a simple five page document. They’re too busy hiking or unboxing the free stuff they got from some big tech company.

      The only reason these people have careers is because most of the people who read their articles don’t know any better. They see a poor quality tech article on The Verge, BGR, 9-to-5 whatever, Computerworld and they believe everything they read. In reality, none of these people have worked in tech. They’ve never written a line of code. Most of their content is about how an iPhone looks, and since that’s all that most people can understand, they accept it as journalism. They’re just technology folk stories, not tech journalism.

      If that’s not bad enough, they recoil at the truth. Go read the document. The iPhone will likely never have a USB-C port. The EU is mostly concerned with USB Micro-B, not Lightning. They even had talks with Apple over this. It’s fake news. It’s pathetic to make up fake technology news, but it’s a standard practice. This is how the weakest tech companies rise to the top.

      Wired was so wrong about the Internet

      This is exactly what I am talking about. This is the best example of the calibre of Western tech media. They’d be better off shipping the whole enterprise off to India.

    2. Hey Bob. When CNN says there’s “breaking news”, do you still rush to your TV? Tech “journalism” is the same thing. The vast majority of people do not read tech articles. They just buy an iPhone and maybe Google a few tips and tutorials. Corporate tech journalism’s duty is to report facts. In reality, they embrace an antithetical duty of sensationalism. They found out that Android fans are still upset about Apple. Really, that’s who cares about USB-C on an iPhone — angry Android fanboys who have no lives. The corporate tech media caters to these pathetic patrons.

      The comments reveal this. You see countless people complaining about Lightning ports on the iPhone, but they clearly aren’t Apple customers. They aren’t aware that several Apple products use Lighting. They’re unaware that hundreds of gadgets use Lightning. They’re unaware that most tasks in the Apple ecosystem can be accomplished wirelessly. The Lightning port is mostly used for charging, and even that’s becoming obsolete.

      Ports will become obsolete, thus Apple won’t need to switch to USB-C on the iPhone. Apple will create a proprietary standard for high-speed wireless communications. Look at their wireless earbuds and headphones. They use proprietary chips to enhance Bluetooth. This is just the beginning. Apple will continue to lead the industry in wireless accessory connectivity.

    1. I think the majority of the corporate tech media is biased. They’re either disguising payola and sponsored content as journalism, or they just got lucky with a viral video and don’t care about the average consumer. They can’t see beyond their own use cases. Even the mighty Marques Brownlee never mentions what people will do with their Lightning accessories if the iPhone switches to USB-C. Like many, he feels it would be so great if Apple went USB-C, then he could use one cable for charging! Wouldn’t it be great if we could all become multi-millionaires with BS YouTube videos that offer a layman’s opinion of tech? Unfortunately, we can’t!

      So I offer another take on Lightning vs. USB-C. It’s all facts. I did a lot of research. It’s not the opinions of some spoiled YouTuber who got lucky with little effort and experience. Who else mentions that Apple actually dominated the USB-C standards process? No one else even realizes there are Lightning accessories out there. People like Marques get everything for free, and he got lucky.

      If you like that “I’m rich, so f–k it” perspective, there’s lots of that in the tech media. These people have never worked in tech. Marques Brownlee had to brown-nose Apple to get into Apple Park. His only interaction with tech is as a tourist.

      Go on YouTube and enjoy the great tech pundits. They can’t write code. They don’t know tech. But their idiotic opinions resonate with the multitudes of idiots — like you! Go watch some idiot unbox a free gadget and spit out some specs he doesn’t understand. It’s just an advertisement sandwiched between ads. The content is just an ad, but most are too ignorant to see it.
      Appledystopia isn’t for everyone. There are so many tech pundits who mimic Joe Rogan. Go find your info-bruh and enjoy the misinformation. You’re just looking for someone who agrees with your idiotic opinions. The good news is that most tech journalists meet your low standards.

  2. “I feel sorry for people who put so much of their self-esteem in the products they own.”

    That’s a very intelligent and thoughtful statement. Clearly, you know how to act without desire. It’s true. One can never be happy when they attach themselves to the fruits of their action, especially a tiny little berry like a Lightning or USB connector. Some are even attached to the seeds! Blindness!

    I can see from this discussion, some are so attached to the fruits of their action — their iPhone — they can no longer see what really matters. Instead of being at peace and performing their duty, they flounder in a state of delusion and inactivity. Such people never achieve greatness. They never attain the highest goal in life.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.